• Probate Administration
  • Estate Planning
  • ONLINE OPTION
  • Special needs Trust
  • Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
  • Conservatorship and Guardianship
    • Offshore Asset Protection
  • About Us
  • Product
  • Product 2
  • Trust Administration
                                             LAW OFFICES OF ROZSA GYENE
                              450 NORTH BRAND BLVD SUITE 623, CA 91203
​                                                         (818)291-6217
​

IRREVOCABLE LIFE INSURANCE TRUST: $995.00 FOR LIMITED TIME ONLY (Regular Price $3,100.00)

THE IRREVOCABLE LIFE INSURANCE TRUST


An insurance policy owned by you on your life at the time of death will be included in your taxable estate and subject to federal estate tax if your estate is the beneficiary or you possess certain ownership rights ("incidents of ownership").

A commonly used technique to avoid inclusion in your estate as the insured, is to create an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) to own the policy and receive the policy proceeds on your death. A properly drafted and administered life insurance trust removes the life insurance proceeds from the gross estate of the insured, while also making those proceeds available as a source of liquid funds for the payment of estate taxes and other obligations.

Fact Pattern:
Let's say it is 2014 and John and Mary, both US citizens are married with one child, Bobby, and live in California. Let's also assume that their combined estate, consisting 100% of community property is valued at $25 million on February 22, 2014, the date of John's death. John and Mary had always talked about seeing an estate planning attorney but never got around to it. By the laws of intestacy of California, Mary, as John's spouse, inherits John's ½ share of the community property ($12.5 million). All $25 million of the estate value is now owned solely by Mary.


​EXAMPLE

Scenario One: 

It is 2014 and the unified credit amount is $5,340,000. John's interest in the community estate is $12.5 million. Even though John had a taxable estate, by virtue of the marital deduction, all of John's property will pass to Mary and completely escape estate taxation at John's death. However, Mary's estate is now worth $25 million which is $19,660,000 more than the exemption exclusion amount for 2014. Let's say Mary dies later in the year from a broken heart. Mary's estate uses her $5,340,000 applicable exclusion for 2014. That leaves $19,660,000, million subject to the 40% estate tax to be paid before the property passes to Bobby.  Instead of Bobby receiving $25 million inheritance from his parents, he will receive $17,136,000 after payment of the estate tax liability of $7,864,000 . This is a large estate tax bill that could have been reduce and possibly eliminated with advance planning. 

Adding insult to injury, if Mary neglected to do her own estate planning for her property, Bobby would be forced to have the property transferred to him through a time consuming, public probate proceeding incurring even more costs.

Scenario Two:
Here we will assume that at the beginning of 2014, John and Mary draft an estate plan. The plan provides that the unified credit exemption equivalent available in the estate of the first spouse to die would be transferred to a Bypass/Credit Shelter Trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse with Bobby as the remainder beneficiary. With our facts, when John died, a marital deduction was claimed and his estate escaped estate taxation. John's exclusion exemption, $5,340,000  for 2014, was placed in a Bypass/Credit Shelter Trust for the benefit of Mary. When Mary passes away later in the year, her estate will use her $5,340,000 exclusion for her estate, and because the $5,340,000 in the Bypass/Credit Shelter Trust will not be included in Mary's estate, the plan has reduced the estate tax liability considerably. In this scenario, the tax liability will be $5,728,000 and Bobby will receive $19,272,000 of inheritance. Considerably less than the tax liability in Scenario One (over $2 million less), but more could be done to reduce the tax exposure.


Scenario Three:
Let's assume the same facts as scenario two, except John and Mary's estate planning professional identifies that $2 million of the estates assets consist of life insurance policies. The attorney prepares an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) effectively taking the value of the life insurance out of the estate for estate tax purposes. Here, at the time Mary dies (John is already dead) John's $5,340,000 unified credit has been preserved by transfer to the Bypass Trust, Mary's $5,340,000 exclusion is utilized at her death and the $2 million from the life insurance has been removed from the estate for valuation purposes by the ILIT.   Mary's taxable estate is $2 million less due to the ILIT planning and Bobby's inheritance is $2 million more for the same reason.


If you own a life insurance policy with a significant death benefit, an irrevocable life insurance trust may be of substantial benefit to you.

    speak with an attorney

Submit
  • Probate Administration
  • Estate Planning
  • ONLINE OPTION
  • Special needs Trust
  • Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
  • Conservatorship and Guardianship
    • Offshore Asset Protection
  • About Us
  • Product
  • Product 2
  • Trust Administration